GNUtian logic in action. GNUtian Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 22:00 +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 19:19 +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > > > You ask how a copy would be acquired without accepting the GPL. > > > > > > Irrelevant. You still don't have the right to make copies and distribute > > > > The right to distribute lawfully made copies (without authority of the > > Irrelevant. You're still confusing _your_copy_ with > _copies_of_your_copy_
Ok. Think of two copies. Try to understand that I've downloaded both copies. Downloaded two times. And I didn't click on any "I agree". As for additional copies of these two copies (apart from 17 USC 117) that I can as well make pursuant to the GPL, they also fall under 17 USC 109 because they are authorized and only contractual covenant (restriction) can interfere with my right to distribute those copies as I see fit. Everyone who is neither blind nor an idiot knows for certain that the GPL is a *LICENSE NOT A CONTRACT* -- Richard Stallman has clarified that fact at least a hundred times. > > And since it's not for lack of information, I can only assume that it's > either for lack of English Comprehension, because otherwise it would > have to be malice. Hey [EMAIL PROTECTED], you are as "malice" as Mini Me of Doctor Evil (except that you are a Mini Me of RMS). Translation: you both are so amusingly insane that it is really fascinating. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
