Bernd Jendrissek wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alexander Terekhov
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Original:
> >
> > unsigned explosive_power = 0;
> > while (still_not_eliminated("FSF"))
> > send_a_bomb("FSF", explosive_power += 10/*kiloton*/);
> >
> >Derivative:
> >
> > unsigned explosive_power = 0;
> > while (still_not_eliminated("FSF")) {
> > fork();
> > send_a_bomb("FSF", max((explosive_power += 10) + random(),
> > 666)/*kiloton*/);
> > }
>
> <terekhov>
> No, that's still just a compilation. All that's changed is that you've
> aggregated the original with the independent works "fork();\n", "max((",
> and ") + random(), 666)".
> </terekhov>
You seem to misunderstand. The resulting overall program containing
independent works for all its components is indeed "still just a
compilation". But it now contains a derivative program (among other
computer program works) -- a derivative set of instructions to
eliminate FSF.
regards,
alexander.
_______________________________________________
Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
