On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 12:54 +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > http://finance.messages.yahoo.com/bbs?.mm=FN&action=m&board=1600684464&tid=cald&sid=1600684464&mid=355346 > http://finance.messages.yahoo.com/bbs?.mm=FN&action=m&board=1600684464&tid=cald&sid=1600684464&mid=355344 > http://finance.messages.yahoo.com/bbs?.mm=FN&action=m&board=1600684464&tid=cald&sid=1600684464&mid=355342
More self quotes. yawn. You seem to forget the court dismissed the case for futility, so I find it hard to believe any appeal won't wonder _why_ they considered it futility... As many have pointed that out to you in ways that only a fool couldn't see, futility is the main gist of Wallace's "5 times amended" complaint. Rui
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
