In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tarquin Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Should the FSF back complete monopolisation by Microsoft, or should
> > it be against, as it aims to produce an operating system written in
> > 100% free software code?
>
> It does neither mean that I back all my neighbors or am against all of
> them if I happen not to try bedding them.
>
> Microsoft is by and large irrelevant to free software as long as they
> don't indulge in business practices that harm free software, like
> pressuring vendors into producing hardware that is incapable of
> running it.
We are all part of the world and connected to each other, the Linux
magazines cannot exist without readers and adverts, the same is true of
other Linux companies including distros.
--
http://www.windowshaters.co.uk
Start an investigation into Microsoft http://www.petitiononline.com/oftsucks/
Reboot Movement (An Anti-Wintel Campaign)
http://www.speccyverse.me.uk/comp/reboot/
_______________________________________________
Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
