>> Right now the GPL makes a distinction for in-house code. Only if >> you distribute binaries do you have to share the source. I was >> just saying that that should change: also in-house code should >> be shared, once it's out of testing. > > Why should that change?
Web services are going to replace software distributed on media. If anyone can use GPL software to offer a service to the public without having to share modifications, that blows free software right out of the water. If you provide it on a website, then it isn't very in-house, it is just pure distribution, and the GPL already handles that. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
