Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Kastrup wrote: > [...] >> Uh, the GPL also has the backing of IBM. > > Yeah. Apart from contributing to just few GPL'd projects for strategic > reasons, it is no secret that IBM treats [L]GPL'd code like a kind of > toxic waste. The general rule is "seek for alternative". The preferred > license for IBM's own open source is the CPL.
Reality check: IBM invested billions into Linux, including donating JFS and mainframe ports. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
