On 2006-06-30, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I need a link, please.
Thank you. Some English-language summaries are at http://www.iusmentis.com/copyright/crashcourse/rights/ http://www.iusmentis.com/auteursrecht/nl/vvv/beperkingen/#uitputting I think you actually know that guy. :) Another site discussing it is http://www.aippi.org/reports/q156/gr-q156-The%20Netherlands-e.htm (scroll down to the answer to question 6, "Copyright law") The full cite is HR 19 januari 1979, NJ 1979, 412 (Hovener/Poortvliet) I noted it got cited in Canada: http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc34/2002scc34.html Since it's from 1979, no one has thought to put up an English-language translation of the case. However the case did not center on 'derivative work' but instead asked the question if the effect of a first sale (exhaustion) would be annulled by exploiting the work "in a new way". And the Dutch Supreme Court said yes. Merijn -- Remove +nospam to reply _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
