After takin' a swig o' grog, Alexander Terekhov belched out this bit o' wisdom:
> Alexander Terekhov wrote: > A: The context is property. Intangible intellectual property (rights granted > under IP license). Property in short. Bzzzzt. > A: Cost to obtain EXISTING property on buyer's side. Price is fixed at zero > in the case of property locked in the GPL pool (e.g. Linux, the GPL part > of it). Bzzzzt. > A: That plus administration overhead, etc. Cost required to create NEW > (GPL derivative works, additions to GPL compilation works) property > on seller's side. The GPL fixes the price below cost. Wallace is > claiming antitrust injury from predatory pricing (pricing below cost) > and says that the whole scheme is in violation of Sherman Act 1. Strike three, you are out! -- "These changes do mean that we are not pursuing a separate delivery of WinFS .... With most of our effort now working towards productizing mature aspects of the WinFS project into SQL and ADO.NET, we do not need to deliver a separate WinFS offering. -- Quentin Clark on the WinFS Team Blog _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
