"Merijn de Weerd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:54:46 +0200 (CEST), "Alfred M. Szmidt" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> The "not paying $1 per copy" is not part of the authorized act. The >> contract establishes two acts: 1) One party authorizes the other >> party to copy 2) The other party accepts the obligation to pay for >> each copy >> >> Of course the "not paying $1 per copy" is part of the authorised act. >> That you insist on listing them as two sperate things is completely >> irrelevant. > > We're not getting through to each other. How do I say this without > getting into a "is too/is not".
I recommend you use Google Groups on Alfred Szmidt and GNU or GPL, pick out a few "discussions", and then consider whether you think yourself smarter than all the people that finally went into "is too/is not" or stopped bothering completely. I think you are perfectly well getting through, but you'll never get anything as a response that would admit it. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
