Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > John Hasler wrote: > [...] >> you see fit. It is only the work consisting of a combination of >> your work and a GPL work that may only be distributed under the >> GPL. > > Sez who? See "mere aggregation" clause in the GPL, retard.
The problem with your argumentation is that you think _every_ combination of code a "mere aggregation". That is not the case, however, and courts as well as jurisdiction are well aware of the difference. If this were not so, some things would be somewhat similar to what you claim. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
