[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] > 3. I then have to distribute the combined work C = O+G under GPL > because that's the terms.
That's not the terms. That's merely GNUtian crackpot theory of derivative works to mislead you. Don't expect to hear this crackpot theory in court of law. The FSF already (in Wallace's case) went on record: "In fact, the GPL itself rejects any automatic aggregation of software copyrights under the GPL simply because one program licensed under the GPL is distributed together with another program that is not licensed under the GPL: "In addition, mere aggregation of another work not based on the Program with the Program (or with a work based on the Program) on a volume of a storage or distribution medium does not bring the other work under the scope of this License." regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss