"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote: [...] > license that disallows charging a fee for copying is not free in any > sense of the word.
How come that the GNU GPL, which prohibits charging a fee *for copying* (see "no charge"), is considered "free" by GNUtians? And, BTW, don't you know the GNU FDL is considered "conditionally free" by majority of 369 debians? http://www.debian.org/News/2006/20060316 He he. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
