In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>No, freeware simply means a non-free program that can be distributed >>>at no cost. >> Where did you get that definition? I don't think most people's use >> of the term excludes free programs. >When there is a charge on them, it usually does. Few people will call >Redhat Enterprise Linux "freeware" since you will be hard to put to >get it outside of an expensive subscription arrangement, in spite of >it being free software. So some free software is - in that view - not freeware. But I was denying Alfred's assertion that freeware is necessarily non-free. -- Richard _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
