In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you explain the "so" in that sentence? Why does the fact that > it is distributed without fee preclude it from being distributed > commercially as well? >If it is commercially distributed, then it is distributed for a fee, >no? Why does the fact that it is distributed without fee preclude it from also being distributed for a fee? At this point it's hard to believe that you're arguing in good faith, so if you come up with another silly response I'm not going to bother replying. -- Richard _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
