> You are not forced to anything, you agreed to follow the license; > see section 5 of the GNU GPL. But, it would be better if you > respected the rights of your users by making your library free > software, would you like to do that and help us in the fight > against a society that subjugates the rights of computer users?
I am forced into a choice of including an example program or making my source code available, yes. This implies that you are forced to include the example, which you are not. By including it, you have agreed to abide by the license that applies to the work. If that is, indeed, the choice, I will happily choose to not include the qt example. It provides little value for the cost. The cost that users have to give up by using your library is much greater, they are not allowed to run, study, improve and/or distribute your work. Instead, you could do the morally and ethically correct thing, and licensing your software under a free software license, would you like to do that? _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss