Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Kastrup wrote: > [...] >> <URL:http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6366> > > You should read his later work as well. > > http://www.rosenlaw.com/Rosen_Ch06.pdf > > In plain language: > > http://www.stromian.com/Corner/Feb2005.html
Of course "in plain language" is a lie since the author of the latter piece does a lot of claims that are quite different from what Rosen states. And anyway, the more important point of my preceding posting was not Rosen's interpretation of the copyright language with regard to derivative works, but the actual text of the law. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
