Seg, 2006-11-06 às 07:59 +0100, Merijn de Weerd escreveu: > On 2006-11-06, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We still believe that we will be the dominant player in the Linux > > market, because by that time there won't be any other Linux players. > > ------ > > > > Hm... is this an invitation for Wallace to file another action under > > Sherman Act 2 monopolization (in addition to his current section 1 > > action)? > > This is stupid even for you. There's nothing illegal about > having a dominant position in a market. It's the *abuse* > of the dominant position that's illegal.
And it is stupid to talk of monopoly when anyone can join in, in Free Software. Maybe you can't work for Red Hat, but you surely can sell support for Red Hat (or RH based) operating systems. Yes, support that goes to the level of source code changes (just look at Oracle and their stupid act... they are just like CentOS but they're doing it in an Oracle way -- broken). Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...?
signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
_______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
