[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] > Alexander, I must admit that when I first read the links you provided, > I got even more confused. But then, I noticed that all of these links > refer to GPL, not LGPL. :)
Forget LGPL. http://www.rosenlaw.com/Rosen_Ch06.pdf ------ The LGPL Alternative [...] an impenetrable maze of technological babble. They should not be in a general-purpose software license. [...] The LGPL concedes that the GPL is a better, more appropriate license, and it allows any licensees to convert to the GPL at their option: You may opt to apply the terms of the ordinary GNU General Public License [...] The LGPL, therefore, is an anomaly ... merely directs us back to the main event, the GPL license itself. ------ See also http://www.usfca.edu/law/determann/softwarecombinations060403.pdf Hope this helps. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
