Richard Tobin wrote: > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Copyleft > >requires all licensees to surrender right to charge for derivative > >works. > > No, it *gives* you the right to distribute derivative works subject to > certain conditions, which is a right that you wouldn't otherwise have > at all.
With one of those "certain conditions" being a requirement to surrender right to charge for derivative works. So your "no" is actually "yes". > > Try exercising your "right" to distribute derivative works of > Microsoft Windows for a charge, and see how far you get. Windows? Well, XP aside for a moment, Microsoft offers standard "Shared Source Premium Derivatives" license for CE product. http://www.microsoft.com/resources/sharedsource/Licensing/Windowsce_premium_rdst.mspx regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
