Byron A Jeff wrote: > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Byron A Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > >Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Whoops!!! > > >Note that folks like Red Hat use trademark enforcement to embed inherent
Trademarks have really nothing to do with Red Hat's mandatory service contract hack of RMS' "freedom 0". They use trademarks to restrict distribution of distro in packaged binary form (CD/DVD images). And that is pretty bogus legally. No confusion could possibly arise from distribution of UNMODIFIED RHAT's stuff (exact copies of RHAT's CD/DVD images) as built and packaged by Red Hat. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
