David Kastrup wrote: > Note that this is what a patent gives you: the right to stop others > from using the same idea without license. The remedy is to have them > pay damages and have them stop.
You always looking in a pocket of patent holder, but this patent story has two sides. In order to cancel this old bad patent system. One should invent a socially acceptable framework, which would simulate people to invent things and facilitate exchange of knowledge. > When talking about the government, you don't even have the option to > stop them. No, you have such option. By not doing patents, you would not share your ideas. > So even if your motivation is not money, and you patent a > new weapon (for example) so that nobody will be allowed to build it, > you can't stop the government from doing so. > > The motivator is money. > > That's how the laws are designed, that's what they center around. > It's all smells like some kind of conspiracy theory. Rich and powerfull monsters against good guys. I am not agree,with that. I don't think that bad-boys design the law under-the-table. Dmitry _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
