"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote: > > The GPL is a contract to make a contract. It's uneforceable in all > 50 US states under their common law. > > The GPL is a copyright license, and is enforceable in all 50 US states > under copyright law.
Yet IBM talks about New York law on preambles and other prefatory language in a contract aiding its interpretation. How come that, oh paragon of intellect? "the Court need not reach the choice of law issue because Utah law and New York law are in accord on the issues that must be reached to address SCO's sole argument on this motion, namely, that SCO did not breach the GPL. Throughout this brief, IBM cites to both Utah law and New York law." regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
