rjack wrote: [...] > One must be careful to define "Component[]" in context.
http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2006/2pet/6invit/2005-1056.pet.ami.inv.html "Although the court of appeals correctly held that software can be a component of a patented invention, it erred in holding that the creation of copies of software overseas, based on a master version provided from the United States, constitutes the supply of those software copies from the United States." So I gather that accoording to USDOJ, supply by means of http://www.research.ibm.com/quantuminfo/teleportation/ would NOT constitute "supply" for the purposes of 35 U.S.C. 271(f) either. Teleporters will undo 35 U.S.C. 271(f)! USDOJ should better inform the Congress know about that!!! regards, alexander. -- "Don't Buy Harry Potter Books" -- http://www.stallman.org _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
