In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>GPLv3 may be interpreted as FSF tortiously interfering with a legal >contract between two parties concerning intellectual property issues >between them. Mr. Perens cites to the case of Daniel Wallace which >was based on a predatory pricing theory under another version of the >GPL and not a group boycott theory as I was suggesting in respect of >the GPLv3. So what's the theory? That you can be sued for urging a "group boycott"? Welcome to the wacky world of American law. How *dare* you oppose the large corporations! -- Richard -- "Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
