On Apr 13, 11:31 pm, Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What about these DAP and PSPP projects? Are they fairly mature and > > ready to use yet? > > I don't know whether I'd call PSPP mature, but we're actively > working on making it better all the time. Your suggestions and > bug reports are welcomed. > -- > "Long noun chains don't automatically imply security." > --Bruce Schneier
At the moment, I'm looking for work and living in a rented room. But when I get my own apartment ( hence my own home office), I'll download your product, your user's manual, and kick the tires. (i'm actually at an apple store now). Because I do want to see how far along your product is. I'm looking in your tarball for test programs(programs written in the , uh, PSPP programming language, with corresponding printout files, to see that the product was tested for that example and any bugs that popped up were resolved). I'm a little confused by what I see, though. Some files seem to have some sample "SPSS" code, but mixed in with code in a very different syntax, and maybe the printout is in the same file(!), at the bottom of the file. I'm a bit confused. Now SPSS and PSPP are recursive, right? So you can have an assignment statement, inside a while-loop, inside an if-else statement, etc. , like you could do with any procedural language? Also, I notice, looking at your Usenet postings, you never ever mention PSPP. Why? _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
