David Kastrup wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > "Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote: > > [...] > >> So then why must it too be free, why must the license require that > >> to be free? > >> > >> To keep things free, again, this was answered as well before. > > > > Man oh man, you're krank. Suppose he takes PUBLIC DOMAIN work and > > links it with the GPL'd work. Nobody can apply ANY copyright license > > to work in public domain. > > You are confused. Licenses apply to particular _copies_, not some
Copyright licenses apply to work, idiot. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
