"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote: > > > The original is no longer free, since it depends on a non-free work. > > The resulting work, a deriviate, is no longer free. And for the last > > time, the GPL cannot make anything free, only the copyright holder > > can. > > How is the free code suddenly dependent on the non free work? > The non-free work is what's dependent on the free code, not > the other way around, in my scenario. > > It is a _deriviate_, that is how it is dependant. It doesn't matter > what depends on what.
Alfred, you have a talent. Now I've got to clean both monitors. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
