On May 28, 2:18 pm, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Seg, 2007-05-28 às 12:05 -0700, mike3 escreveu: > > > Any response? > > > Please respond, I'd really like to know if I've finally gotten this > > understood. > > I already said in another email that I think you're starting to get it. >
OK. "Email"? Did you mean a Usenet posting? > However, the way you write is so convoluted that it is hard for me to > "certify", with my knowledge which is quite far from Stallman's, whether > you did or not in what would seem to me a conclusive form. > That's because I need to say precisely what I'm referring to so that you don't make an incorrect assumption or get the drift wrong. Is this simpler? --- The rationale for the GPL is to ensure not only that free software stays free, but also to help encourage the creation of new free software. In order to satisfy *both* goals, the *entirety* of a derivative work is required to be released under the GPL, not just the originally GPL parts. --- > Maybe if you try to express your self one doubt at a time and in as > simple a form as possible? > Is the above better? > Thanks,Rui > > -- > + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown > + Whatever you do will be insignificant, > | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi > + So let's do it...? > > signature.asc > 1KDownload _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
