On May 28, 2:39 pm, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Seg, 2007-05-28 às 12:04 -0700, mike3 escreveu: > > > And therefore the GPL is more of a copyright license, whereas the MS- > > EULA > > is more of a contract -- since the MS-EULA _takes away_ rights one > > would > > otherwise have, whereas the GPL _grants_ rights one would otherwise > > _not_ have. > > Why... I argue that perhaps MS-EULA would be illegal in most copyright > laws were it not for all those "except where prohibited by law" :) >
So are you saying the copyright law is too restrictive? > Rui > > -- > + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown > + Whatever you do will be insignificant, > | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi > + So let's do it...? > > signature.asc > 1KDownload _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
