On Aug 12, 1:24 am, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mike3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What exactly then is being said in the quoted passage? > > It defines "internal use", the situation where no distribution occurs. > For example, if you made a lot of changes to a GPL program by > inserting a bunch of private material, and then something breaks and > you hire a programmer to fix it. This programmer does not have the > right to distribute your modified program to the world under the terms > of the GPL. >
Oh, and the license is directed at this hired guy, then. But does the terms under the GPL mean that _you_ cannot go and grant the hired guy permission to distribute your program even if for some odd reason you wanted to? > -- > David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
