Tim Tyler wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > Tim Tyler wrote:
>
> >> If they were contracts, you would have to sign them ...
> >
> > You're misinformed, that is just one of many forms to manifest assent.
> > Assent may be manifested by written or spoken words, or by conduct. See
> > also
> >
> > http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:mss:13269
> > (Re: conducting a sane and efficient GPLv3, LGPLv3 Review)
>
> Right - but surely you get the point: a license doesn't
> take away any freedoms of the recipient - therefore
Which license are you talking about? The [L]GPL (both 2 and 3)
purports to impose a whole bunch of covenants ("conditions" but
not "conditions precedent") upon licensees. See, for example
http://www.actonline.org/library/GPLv3-Contract-or-Copyright.html
regards,
alexander.
--
"The revolution might take significantly longer than anticipated."
-- The GNU Monk Harald Welte
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
