mike3 writes: > I've never really been able to understand this exactly. Why wasn't the > license made so that it would only require you release the _GPL-covered > parts_ under GPL and distribute them in such a way that they remain free > -- why does it take releasing the original parts of the package TOO in > order to keep the GPL stuff free?
The point is to increase the amount of Free Software. Otherwise you might just as well use the BSD license. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI USA _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
