David Kastrup wrote: > > Arnoud Engelfriet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On 2007-11-24, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> But you better hire a darn brilliant lawyer if you want to get your > >> punishment reduced because you consistently and from the start relied on > >> a business plan involving defrauding the customers and misappropriating > >> copyrighted material. > > > > Sounds like Google? > > So where do they plead for reduced punitive damages because they never > intended to recompensate anybody in the first place? > > > Arnoud Engelfriet, Dutch & European patent attorney - Speaking only > > for myself > > Probably better that you speak for nobody else.
Hands off Arnie, GNUtian dak! Google is 100 percent felon under GNU Law (just like the latest SFLC's targets Xterasys Corporation and High-Gain Antennas): http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:mss:14537 http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:mss:14540 http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:mss:14550 regards, alexander. -- "Plaintiffs copyrights are unique and valuable property whose market value is impossible to assess" -- SOFTWARE FREEDOM LAW CENTER, INC. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
