On Dec 7, 3:43 pm, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:21:07PM -0800, mike3 wrote: > > Hmm, so does this mean that the reason why GNU deserves credit > > in the _name_ and not somewhere else is because GNU's contribution > > is so significant -- they pretty much built most of the rest of the > > system? > > One thing doesn't exclude the other. They have recognition in many > places, but pretending that GNU doesn't exist by calling the whole for > the name of a tiny fraction is definitly not fair. > > Anyways, the GNU projects wants recognition as a means to alert people > for freedom, for their rights, not as a vanity contest. >
Wasn't questioning why they wanted recognition, I was just asking about the _proper place_ for recognition. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
