Miles Bader wrote:
David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Anyway, your trolling is becoming unimaginative at the moment: you went
through all this already previously. Try something more original.
It seems like mike3's done this exact same troll 50 or 60 times. He
waits a bit in between attempts, presumably in the hope that some new
readers will come along who might take his "questions" seriously.
-Miles
From the Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll
"An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone
who intentionally posts controversial or contrary messages in an
on-line community such as an on-line discussion forum or group
with the singular intention of baiting users into an
argumentative response.[1] It often has a broader meaning
referring to any shady trouble making Internet activity."
Posting accusations of "troll" against other posters can easily
fall under the definition of trolling. What delicious
self-referential irony. Trollers and trollees alike entwined in
an orgasmic, communicative and collaborative embrace.
Regards,
rjack
--- "Although the United States Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. ยงยง
101-1332, grants exclusive jurisdiction for infringement claims
to the federal courts, those courts construe copyrights as
contracts and turn to the relevant state law to interpret them.";
Automation by Design, Inc. v. Raybestos Products Co., 463 F3d
749, (Seventh Cir. 2006) ---
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss