Ivan Fomichev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 14 апр, 15:18, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > For me, "weak copyleft" means >> > 1. non-greedy, that is the license must allow any software to get >> > profit of licensed software >> The GPL is not prohibiting profit. > It does. It does not prohibit profit for people, but it does for > software, which is not licensed under the terms of GPL.
In what way can software "profit"? >> > GPL is the worst choice, even besides its illegibility. It is greedy, >> I don't understand a single word of what you are trying to state. I am >> not even sure that you have a clear picture of it yourself. > I do have. I'm nice and I want my software to be nice too. So I'm > measuring it from my point of view, as if it were me. I would like my > software to do all the things the way I would do. Software is not people. And it is impossible to guess just what the software should do like you, and what not. I consider it likely that you don't want to have it go to the lavatory. >> > and who dares speak about self-esteem being full of hubris? >> Again, I don't understand a single word of what you are trying to say. > > I cannot believe, that human valuables are empty words for you. Deliberately sprinkled over software, they are. >> > 3. Self-esteemed, that is the license must require any modified >> > versions of software to be also open source >> But that is pretty much what the GPL enforces. > > It just restricts more than a nice license should. Whatever. Good luck. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
