2008/5/28 Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > The terms of the MIT license are a > > > subset of the terms of the GPL so by complying with the latter > > > you are complying with the former. > > > > Okay, once again for mentally challenged: Complying with the > > latter under GNUtian viral "work based on" theory requires > > "relicensing" > > (seehttp://fsfeurope.org/projects/gplv3/barcelona-rms-transcript.en.html) > > Forget what Stallman might _say_ - he is no a lawyer. > > He does get his info directly from lawyers; and this cannot be said > for Terekhov. So it is foolish to forget what RMS says just because he > doesn't have a degree in law.
This is true of Stallman's written works, but I would be very wary of putting any trust in something from a transcription of an audio recording of a spoken comment made in a Q&A session after a speech. -- Regards, Dave I support www.gnuherds.org - democratic free software jobs _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
