On Jun 27, 1:10 am, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > On Jun 27, 12:02 am, rjack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That's the gist of his statements and has always been here. He is a > troll, so you'll likely get quite a better view of the situation even by > just reading the GPL text front to back. Oh, thanks for clarification! For the future, can you advise me how to differentiate between lawyers talking law-speech and trolls talking nonsense? ;-) I have read the GPL several times, and besides the cited FAQ I don't see a reason why you may not be allowed to offer remote X access to a linux system running (modified) GPL programs as long as you make sure that the remote user can't get access to the actual program code. And we are far away from planning such almost direct access. Philipp Schmidt _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
