Hi all, three subject items written in reverse order with regard to their importance:
First thing is human dignity, the right of free speech is derived from it. As we are human beings, we should not risk being injailed for our publishings for example, as it's the case nowadays. From human dignity results: every law, every treaty must be understandable by the leverage intelligent, or to say by the majority. That affects GPL: We should neither need nor maintain special counselling firms to tell the contents of the GPL. If it is so, it's wrong, it violates human dignity the extent, counselling is needed. If FSF violates human dignity by itself, it will not be taken serious claiming derived minor items as free Software. At least, that's the danger I see. Tanks all participating Andreas Röhler _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
