Ciaran O'Riordan wrote: [...] > Also, it seems your point is that copyright law is unethical, not > specifically the GPL. > > This is back to the age old question of whether free speech means I can > shout "Fire!" in a packed cinema. (I suppose "Bomb!" is the modern > version.)
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (US Supreme Court) maintained that "copyright's built-in free speech safeguards are generally adequate" and that "the copyright clause empowers Congress to determine the intellectual property regimes that, over all, in that body's judgment, will serve the ends of the clause". See <http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B04E3D81131F935A25752C0A9659C8B63>. Hey Ciaran, did your salary at FSF Europe raise similarly to Moglen's (see SFLC's last FORM 990)? Just curious. Well, it may well be that you truly subscribe to RMS' vision "Don't buy a house, a car or have children. The problem is they're expensive and you have to spend all your time making money to pay for them." Do you have a car/house/children, Ciaran? regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
