Hyman Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Kastrup wrote: >>>> I don't see why. > > In any case, you don't win antitrust cases by worrying about > what might happen in the future. You have to demonstrate > actual, present harm.
Well, and an actual, present monopoly position, too. And a particular leverage of this position being applied to the market. > If you think about it, every company wishes that they could become > Microsoft. If Wallace was right, a company could be sued just for > making an excellent product! A bit more than that, actually. But speculation about "if Wallace was right" is sort of moot because first one would have to figure out what his claim is. Even after several admonitions and a lot of prodding of the court, he failed to state one. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
