Alexander Terekhov wrote:
I just wonder how long will it take until some GPL defendant decides that "enough is enough" and initiates disbarrment of the entire SFLC gang including Aaron K. Williamson (AW1337).
Alexander, We must give credit where credit is due. The S.F.L.C. attorneys are *consistent* and we may *always* count on them. They have filed six consecutive incompetent pleadings in the Southern District of New York. Six complaints that fail to comply with the jurisdictional requirements set forth by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit involving copyright infringement complaints. To wit: "It [The Copyright Act] provides that 'no action for infringement of the copyright in any United States work shall be instituted until preregistration or registration of the copyright claim has been made in accordance with this title.' . . . Whether this requirement is jurisdictional is not up for debate in this Circuit. On two recent occasions, we have squarely held that it is".; In re Literary Works in Electronic Databases Copyright Litigation 509 F.3d 116 (2nd Cir. 2007). Just one more reason why Americans distrust lawyers. The S.F.L.C. lawyers need not fear the court's rebuke though. The one (and probably only) thing they learned in law school was how to file a motion for voluntary dismissal -- conveniently preventing the court from reviewing their moronic, incompetent pleadings. Sincerely, Rjack :) "Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." -- John Adams, 'Argument in Defense of the Soldiers in the Boston Massacre Trials,' December 1770 _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
