Tim Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> [Well, I skimmed it, but it was quickly obvious that a skim is all it >> deserved.] > > Can you give any specific criticism?
The meritlessness of that paper, at least insofar as it could create problems for GPL enforcers, has been proven by the zero reaction of the rich companies with big legal teams who stand to gain from creating such problems. So since there's no useful application for an analyses of why it is wrong, I won't spend time doing that. -- Ciarán O'Riordan, +32 477 36 44 19, http://ciaran.compsoc.com/ Support free software, join FSFE's Fellowship: http://fsfe.org Recent blog entries: http://fsfe.org/en/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/using_latex_to_make_pdf_documents_with_japanese_characters http://fsfe.org/en/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/links_sean_daly_kde_swpat_chessboxing http://fsfe.org/en/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/links_india_pats_clipperz_freegis_rms_emacs http://fsfe.org/en/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/using_and_writing_emacs_22_input_methods _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
