Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Kastrup <Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum> wrote: >> >> Since they share this property with the courts and their decisions >> quite > > Please (re)visit the link below, you amusingly crazy clownish GNU GPL > true believer dak.
[...] > The caveat being (comment from a third party licensed German lawyer): > > ----- > Das Urteil sollte mit der Berufung angegriffen werden. Yes, that's just what I say. To support your views, you cite a court decision and a comment that explains why the court must have been wrong. I repeat: in legal matters, the decisions of the courts, not the commentators, count, regardless how silly you and isolated commentators may consider them. And if the courts decide different from what you think they should do time and again, it is not the courts that are crazy clowns clueless about legal matters. Mistakes happen: that's what appellate courts are for. But they are the exception rather than the rule. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
