On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 11:17:29 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >>> What if the license lacks consideration? >> >> If it lacks consideration it is not a contract. If it is not a contract >> it is not a license. > > And if it is not circular, it isn't reasoning. Or something.
Where does he get this notion that every license is a contract? They're similar, certainly, but, AFAIK, one isn't a subset of the other. -Thufir _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
