Alexander Terekhov wrote:
How do you explain continued 'litigation' by the SFLC for many month after availability of the source code from Hammer Storage site, Hyman?
The same way I always do. Legal processes are slow. They work through exchanges of papers filed with courts, with negotiations between lawyers, and with meetings before judges. Even a simple exchange of views can take weeks. So when a company decides to come into compliance with the GPL, they can do that relatively quickly, more quickly than all of the legal machinery can be deactivated. Also, having the source code available before the case ends means that the SFLC can verify that the defendants are in fact properly compliant with the GPL. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
