Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> writes: >The District Court appears to have decided to ignore >the meat of the opinion of the Appeals Court ><http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1001.pdf> >while selectively reading just a bit of it and claiming >to obey it....
No, he probably did the right thing -- notice he gave leave to amend. If he rules in favor of JMRI without establishing enough facts, then the defendant would contest that and maybe win. If JMRI refiles its motion with more facts, it may get an injunction that would be upheld on appeal. -- Rahul http://rahul.rahul.net/ _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
