"Hyman Rosen" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
amicus_curious wrote:
They have a requirement to publish the source that they copied for
> free so that some router user might see it and be moved to improve it.
> That is kind of a laugh, I think.
They must make the source code available as required by its license
so that users of the software are free to run it, examine it, change
it, and share it. Whether and how users choose to avail themselves of
these freedoms is not relevant to honoring the terms of the license.
It is still a joke. What firmware or software have you personally ever
bothered to examine, change, or share? The whole idea is preposterous.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss