Hyman Rosen wrote: >Rjack wrote: >> >> It is a verifiable fact that ever completed suit filed by the SFLC >> was terminated by the plaintiff's voluntary dismissal.
Because the plaintiffs got what they wanted, the defendant's compliance to the terms of the GPL. Sheesh. >It is a verifiable fact that in each such case the defendants >made the GPLed sources available, as asked in the complaint >against them, when they were not doing so at some point before >the complaint was filed. > >It remains the case that no one is using your (incorrect) legal >theories to openly violate the terms of the GPL. Everyone acts >as if the GPL is a valid license which means just what it says, >even people who are opposed to its principles. Amazing how the anti-OSS trolls don't mind, at all, making complete jackasses of themselves. -- 'A lot of OSS is simply crap. And if it were "for sale" they would soon go out of business.' - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
