Alexander Terekhov wrote:
SIXTH DEFENSE (FIRST SALE DOCTRINE) Plaintiffs claims are barred by the first sale doctrine.
When defendants post an answer to a complaint, they assert every conceivable defense against the arguments of the plaintiffs. That's routine lawyering. Then the plaintiffs have to respond as to why the defenses are incorrect, and so on back and forth, with the judge deciding validity.
SFLC voluntarily dismissed the case shortly after
> Bell Microproducts filed the answer to the complaint. Here is the SFLC's complaint: <http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2008/jun/10/busybox/bell-complaint.pdf> Notice that is against Bell Micro, doing business as Hammer Storage. Here is Hammer Storage's support website: <http://www.hammer-storage.com/support/software_updates.asp> Notice that you may download GPLed sources from there. As always, the case was dismissed because the defendants came into compliance with the GPL. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss